Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 10:46

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Any straight men had a gay experience in the past? What was it and how did you feel?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
First look at Battlefield 6 campaign leaks from latest test - Video Games Chronicle
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
This Device Pulls Clean Drinking Water Out of the Air - VICE
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Nasa delays next flight of Boeing’s alternative to SpaceX Dragon - The Edge Malaysia
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
UNC Botches Lead, Falls to Arizona in Super Regional Rubber Match - 247Sports
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How to use Google's AI-powered NotebookLM — 5 tips to get started - Tom's Guide
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.